Why Beijing put a stop to the Ant IPO I FT ant financial l?a d?o

by msithailandDFG



หน่วยงานกำกับดูแลของจีนหยุดสิ่งที่จะเป็นรายการที่ใหญ่ที่สุดในประวัติศาสตร์ในนาทีสุดท้ายที่ทำให้ทั้ง บริษัท และนักลงทุนที่ต้องการซื้อหุ้น Ant ไม่พอใจ Hudson Lockett นักข่าวตลาดเอเชียของ FT อธิบายว่าทำไมพวกเขาถึงทำแบบนั้น ดูว่าคุณได้รับ FT ฟรีในฐานะนักเรียนหรือไม่ (หรือเริ่มการทดลองใช้มูลค่า 1 ปอนด์: ► ตรวจสอบแท็บชุมชนของเราเพื่อดูเรื่องราวเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับเศรษฐกิจ ► ฟังพอดแคสต์ของเรา: ► ติดตามเราบน Instagram: .

Images related to the topic ant financial l?a d?o

Why Beijing put a stop to the Ant IPO I FT

Why Beijing put a stop to the Ant IPO I FT

Search related to the topic Why Beijing put a stop to the Ant IPO I FT

#Beijing #put #stop #Ant #IPO
Why Beijing put a stop to the Ant IPO I FT
ant financial l?a d?o
ดูวิธีการทำเงินออนไลน์ล่าสุดทั้งหมด: ดูเพิ่มเติมที่นี่
ดูวิธีการทำเงินออนไลน์ล่าสุดทั้งหมด: ดูเพิ่มเติมที่นี่

You may also like

32 comments

Mostafa Amin 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Translate to Arabic

Reply
Mr H 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Jack Ma packaged and sold the loans to the banks similar to the sub-prime mortgage back in 2008, thanks to the regulators, we have avoided another round of GFC during pandemic

Reply
Yvonne Hyatt 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

5-G ??????

Reply
wu wei 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

马云这个吸血鬼,让中国的无数零售商陷入了绝境!

Reply
G June36 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Short summary: The company wants to be run like a bank, but without all the regulations banks are subject to.

Reply
erodadi1 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Regulators make right decision.

ANT provide financial service like bank and then it should have compliance like normal Bank … everything related with financial services should be handle prudent.

Kudos to china regulators by prevent financial crisis from the begining.

Reply
Napoleon Chua 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

the real reason is jack ma group fail to give share to greedy CCP

Reply
M L 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

In face of China's effort to eradicate poverty, allowing a monopolistic loan shark to go IPO and build up its pyramid scheme with the national banking system, is a slap to the entire Chinese nation. Well done China, for seeing what's developing and understanding the impact, and put a stop to it. This is the "socialistic" aspect of China showing its nature.

Reply
GreaterBayArea Hero 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Jack Ma would have taken all the profits whilst shifting the risks to the China Government. Jack Ma is an example of Power corrupts and Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Reply
Michael Thong 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

China is right protecting the pub.

Reply
Markus Müller 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

So far the first part of the story … here's the second more relevant part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UsrMSSOfs0&list=PL7tB6qL0r-AZSY44AWxRhnKCP3D1_KZee For translations: Use in the clip (bottom right side) the left button "subtitles" and choose with the button "settings [gearwheel]" your pref. language: "Subtitle" – "Translate automatically" – "English"

Reply
LoC28C 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

For the benefit of everyone I believe the regulators did the right thing otherwise it might have sent shockwaves across the globe hence devastating the already battered global markets. There will then make the livelihood of more people in jeopardy. There will be more homeless people, starvation and so on.

Reply
Ramon Ching 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Prudence can never be a bad thing when it comes to safeguarding other people's money.
And never trust anybody who doesn't have his money in the game.

Reply
Satoshi Nakamoto 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Caca

Reply
K G 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Great Shirt!

Reply
Meri Liu 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

CCP:"Critise me more then I will make your companies bankrupt!"

Reply
ALJJ 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

The real reason is because Jack Ma forgot to give Xi Jin Ping some shares

Reply
imeldo marcos 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Risk was humongous.

Reply
Sumit Gupta 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Why is it necessary to sign up to read your articles online?

Reply
vinh nguyen 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

He didn't explain anything

Reply
Jeff 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

The regulators are definitely right doing so, otherwise, it would be a huge risk for China's financial system. WE don't want the 2008 American financial crisis to happen again, which the whole world suffered.

Reply
astt99 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

This is a right move to prevent crisis like Lehman Brother.

Reply
Dr. Tetramin Flakes 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

stop whispering

Reply
Joseph zaragoza wheeler 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Don't know go out business is year. Don't know be back to business. Why not try go back other plan. The plan was proven without China and governor Don't not working. But only the plan to got new ideas next time. Remember that go out business no reason. Not to do for long term got nothing

Reply
Tom Sawyer 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

They don't want a repeat of 2008 in China, duh.

Reply
ai Book 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

for decades, China is the best country in the world to protect small people actually, no one recognized it. From Mao to Deng, peasants, farmers, city immigrants are the backbone of China and had saved China time after time. Communism had done what Americans cannot do, eliminating poverty, building robust infrastructure, health system, social care, pensioner care, all for the lowest and poorest people in China. This is no surprise that among all nations the Chinese government received the highest praise from its people during the pandemic according to World Democracy Barometer.

Reply
quixoticfallcy 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

Can’t sell snake oil when it isn’t even snake oil…

Reply
Sandy 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

I totally support The Chinese Government at this matter, they did the right thing and save the banks and people. Jack Ma did a good job to improve the internet sales, payment, etc in China, however he wants to build his financial empire by moving sub-prime lending into China but refuse the regulations, if this idea is successful, who will the winner? Who will be the loser? I used to work in the financial field, I can not deeply think……

Reply
Car Rental 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

You English men has miss interpreted wrongly, CCP is preventing another similar Sub prime bad load happening in China..

Reply
Anthony 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

gonna be a nice pickup with the potentially cut in half ipo price

Reply
SNG S 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

The Chinese Government has taken a bold step by being an innovator and leading by example, themselves. They have done the right thing! Great to have innovation, however, it should be accompanied by a certain measure of regulation to make a win-win situation! The last thing, anyone wants, a repeat of the 2008 Financial crisis!

Reply
KM Tang 12/10/2021 - 6:31 Chiều

look many China cos like Muddy waters claimed are scams. having work there before i fully agree.
many outsiders want to make quick bucks…..so who cares..

Reply

Leave a Comment